data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b35a/1b35a61627a0b65c8304ae323e08dc4aea815b15" alt=""
I asked about this waste. It was pointed out that the £1.1million cost could be doubled to £2.2million if you add in the associated charges of getting extra cover and lost work. That would mean that our council is throwing away £726,000 of Hammersmith and Fulham tax payers’ money on people who don’t turn up to training courses - a sum getting on for almost 1.5% of council tax.
It turns out that there’s been virtually no objective assessment of why that happens; there’s little to no pre and post training course work to ensure the training will deliver productivity benefits and there has been a widespread culture of acceptance at all levels of the organisation that this frivolous approach is a professional way to behave.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8787b/8787bf27731cad5f111681b7acf04df9dacc2d62" alt=""+-+Chronicle+front+page+24.09.09.jpg)
Consider the Council's £186million total budget; H&F Conservative’s failure in invest in extra police; the £547 increase in meals on wheels charges to save £150,000; or any of the other cuts in key public services and stealth taxes then it puts their £726,000 waste in this area into a different perspective.
UPDATE: The Fulham and Hammersmith Chronicle have also featured this story in this week's edition. Click on the photo (opposite) to read Aidan Jones' exposé.
3 comments:
That money could of gone for new barriers andticket paying machines in the car park next to the king Shopping centre.has it keep breaking when i go there.
Nearly the same as the estimated income from charging disabled and older people for essential support. Charging is unethical, join HAFCAC and fight community care cuts.
hafcac@hotmail.co.uk
What a waste! Pathetic really.
Post a Comment